Vernunft Und Glaube Bei Kant

English summary: Kant's Critique of Pure Reason denies knowledge in order to make room for faith. But how is this room to be shaped? According to Kant, by a rational belief which states the truth of some theoretical propositions only from a practical point of view, while for the theoretical use of r [...]
Visa längre beskrivning

English summary: Kant's Critique of Pure Reason denies knowledge in order to make room for faith. But how is this room to be shaped? According to Kant, by a rational belief which states the truth of some theoretical propositions only from a practical point of view, while for the theoretical use of reason these propositions have to remain undecided. Burkhard Nonnenmacher subjects Kant's determination of the relationship of faith and reason to a thorough analysis by explicating its relationship to the Architectonic of Pure Reason. In this context, Kant's central conclusions on fundamental theology are developed alongside his main decisions on dogmatics, with the latter paying special regard to Kant's Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. The study calls into question whether Kant's determination of the relationship between sin, grace and justification as well as his positions concerning Christology, Ecclesiology and Eschatology have to be regarded as being without any alternative. Furthermore, it seeks methodological problems in Kant's approach and searches for the significance of these for systematic theology today. German description: Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft schafft "zum Glauben Platz," indem sie "das Wissen aufhebt." Doch wie ist dieser Platz zu gestalten? Nach Kant nicht irgendwie, sondern durch einen "Vernunftglauben," der "in praktischer Absicht" fur wahr halt, was fur den theoretischen Vernunftgebrauch unentschieden bleibt. Burkhard Nonnenmacher analysiert Kants Verhaltnisbestimmung von Vernunft und Glaube von Grund auf und entfaltet ihre Beziehung zur "Architektonik der reinen Vernunft." Kants fundamentaltheologische Weichenstellungen werden dabei ebenso dargestellt wie Kants materialdogmatische Grundentscheidungen der Religionsschrift. Gefragt wird, ob Kants Verhaltnisbestimmung von Sunde, Gnade und Rechtfertigung sowie seine die Christologie, Ekklesiologie und Eschatologie betreffenden Positionierungen alternativlos sind, welche methodologischen Probleme sich an Kants Entwurf studieren lassen und was diese Probleme fur die Systematische Theologie der Gegenwart bedeuten.